Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Public loses out on train profits

Tuesday 22 October 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Government rejected advice from its own rail franchising director that would have allowed taxpayers to share windfall profits made by the privatised train companies, it emerged last night.

A report by Sir John Bourn, head of the National Audit Office (NAO), discloses that the franchising director, Roger Salmon, made the recommendation to Sir George Young, Secretary of State for Transport, in May 1995 but it was ignored.

Mr Salmon, who has been ordered to appear before the Commons Public Accounts Committee on Monday, urged ministers to insert a clause in the sale agreements allowing taxpayers to share in any "abnormally high profits".

This, he considered, would provide better value for money for the public, the NAO says. The report goes on to say ministers took the view that there might be "drawbacks in presentational and value-for-money terms in not being able to claw back super-profits".

Nevertheless, his advice was rejected on the grounds that it might deter bidders from competing for franchises and encourage them to bid for more subsidy to compensate.

The report on the sale of the first three franchises, Great Western Trains, SouthWest Trains and the London-Tilbury- Southend Line, also shows the Government spent pounds 40m on advisers' fees without complying with Treasury guidelines for competitive tendering.

Last night, Labour said Sir George had "bulldozed" the advice of Mr Salmon out of the way in his haste to speed privatisation. Labour also pointed out that in ignoring Mr Salmon it was technically disregarding the advice of a government-appointed accounting officer. Andrew Smith, Labour's frontbench transport spokesman, said: "In forcing through rail privatisation at any cost, bulldozing the profit-sharing proposals of his own accounting adviser, the Secretary of State gave the green light for super-profits at the taxpayers' expense."

The NAO report shows four of the bidders for the first three franchises raised the issue of revenue risk-sharing themselves. Under this proposal they would have shared super-profits with the taxpayer if they exceeded 15 per cent of turnover. But the franchising director would have had to provide extra subsidy if revenues fell by 10 to 20 per cent.

The LTS franchise was finally taken over by Prism, a consortium of four bus companies, after the management buy-out team which had originally been awarded the franchise was caught up in a fraud investigation.

Stagecoach, another bus company, won the auction for SouthWest Trains, the biggest commuter railway in Europe, operating services from Waterloo Station. Since the award of the franchises, shares in Prism have leapt fourfold, netting its seven founder investors a personal fortune of pounds 26m. Shares in Stagecoach have risen by more than 25 per cent.

The other franchise, Great Western Trains, was acquired by a management buy-out team, Great Western Holdings.

For Labour, Mr Smith added: "This is a clear sign that ministers allowed privatisation to proceed on a nod and a wink behind closed doors before proper instructions had been issued. This behaviour flies in the face of public accountability." Business comment, page 19

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in