Prints `doubt' on Carl killing
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.HEATHER MILLS
Home Affairs Correspondent.
A senior prosecutor involved in the trial of the men jailed 16 years ago for the murder of the newspaper boy Carl Bridgewater has urged the Home Secretary to re-open the case because vital fingerprint evidence was never disclosed.
Michael Chance, who has since left the director of public prosecutions office, has written to Michael Howard, outlining his "concern" that the discovery of unidentified fingerprints on Carl's bicycle was not revealed at the trial. He has urged Mr Howard to rethink his provisional decision in December not to refer the men's case back to the Court of Appeal.
In letters to be disclosed on the BBC's Rough Justice programme tonight, he calls the non-disclosure of prints - not belonging to any of the convicted men - as a "disturbing error" and said "this of itself militates towards the Home Secretary now giving further consideration".
Although Mr Howard has yet to reach a final decision, he looks set to reject Mr Chance's concerns. A letter from Timothy Kirkhope, a Home Office minister, says "there was no reason to connect marks on Carl's bike with the crime".
The men's lawyers believe the prints could have been left by the intruders at the farm, who threw it into a pig sty. The prints only came to light in 1994 as part of the Merseyside police inquiry into the case.
Michael Hickey, 33, his cousin Vincent Hickey, 41, and James Robinson, 61, have always protested their innocence since they were convicted in February 1979 of shooting dead the 13-year-old newspaper boy. Carl was killed when he stumbled across a burglary at Yew Tree farm, near Stourbridge.
The men were convicted largely on the evidence of Patrick Molloy, who was convicted of the lesser charge of manslaughter. He died in prison in 1981, claiming he had been forced into making a false confession.
t Rough Justice: Who Killed Carl Bridgewater?; BBC1; 9.30pm.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments