Prince's estate files trademark claim for specific shade of purple
Other companies have trademarked colours used in certain contexts.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The estate of late musician Prince has reportedly filed a claim to trademark a particular shade of the colour purple.
If successful film and music producers could be banned from using it.
Paisley Park Enterprises Inc, set up in memory of the singer, filed a trademark application for “Love Symbol #2, which it claims is the “official colour across the brand he left behind,” ABC News reported.
Prince often wore the colour purple and planning to tour with a piano that was the same shade as Love Symbol #2 before he died.
While it is impossible to patent a colour, it is possible to trademark one for certain uses.
For example, if you started selling jewellery in Tiffany blue boxes, you would be in trouble; that’s why the colour “Tiffany Blue” isn’t listed in pantone guides. To win a lawsuit against someone using that colour on their boxes, Tiffany would have to argue that they were using the colour to try to create confusion in the marketplace.
If the estate wins the trademark, it doesn’t mean that no one could use that particular shade of purple for any purpose. It would only mean that, without permission from the trademark holder, no one could use it for film and musical performances in a way that leads the audience to associate them with Prince.
Prince and his estate are famously protective of their copyrighted material. In 2016, Universal Music even filed a DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) takedown notice on a video of people singing the song “Purple Rain.” A large group of people in Minneapolis were singing the song as tribute to the late singer just after his death.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments