pounds 33m winnings from court cases unclaimed
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A TOTAL of pounds 33m, representing the winnings from thousands of courtroom battles dating back to the 18th century, remains unclaimed in court accounts. And in a highly critical report, the National Audit Office (NAO) warned that the management of the money has been so woeful that the identity of thousands of owners of assets totalling pounds 10m was unknown.
The funds include the spoils of modern litigation, as well as centuries old treasures, all of which is waiting to be claimed by the rightful litigants.
By law, these funds, which were originally paid into court to cover legal costs, must be held by the state in perpetuity. The NAO noted that in an "index" of 10,000 pages of 73,000 accounts, many of the entries were "meaningless". It found that pounds 10m of the pounds 33m paid to cover legal costs and held by the Court Funds Office, had not been allocated an owner while there was a risk of double payments paid out on the same account.
Yesterday, the NAO refused to approve the accounts for the second year running.
The report will cause further embarrassment for the Public Trust Office, whose staff oversee the accounts. Earlier this year the PTO was criticised by the NAO and the Public Accounts Committee of the House of Commons for the way it handled the financial affairs of the mentally incapacitated.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments