Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

pounds 12m for four sacked staff

Monday 18 January 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A JURY has awarded $20m (pounds 12m) to four former employees of a Wal-Mart store in Kentucky after deciding that the company unfairly fired them for eating damaged nuts and confectionery.

The jury deliberated for 90 minutes on Friday before awarding each of the four workers $1m for slander, $1m for embarrassment and mental anguish and $3m in punitive damages. The judgment was against both Wal- Mart and the Monticello store manager.

Virginia Stringer - who also received $20,000 for loss of wages - Reual Ed Angel, Donnie Brummett and Tina Sparks had all worked at the store for about six years when they were fired in 1995. They were confronted by management with videotaped evidence that they had eaten cashews and breath mints from packages damaged in shipping, said their lawyer, Larry Rogers.

He said snacks in torn or damaged packages could not be sold and were unwanted by the manufacturers.

Wal-Mart claimed during the three-day trial the four violated a company pilferage policy.

The tapes showed the four did eat a small number of nuts and mints. But the employees maintained that they were following an unwritten policy in which such food was left in lounges for employees - and managers - to consume. (AP)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in