Polo not the only mint with a hole
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A legal battle over the possession of nothing was resolved yesterday as the Court of Appeal told Polo that a hole by any other name would taste as sweet.
What happens to the middle of Polo mints has been debated by bar-room philosophers ad infinitum. But now we know that, whatever it is, Nestle UK, Polo's makers, cannot guarantee exclusive rights to the title "the mint with a hole".
The company had tried to get an injunction stopping the American sweet, Life Savers, being marketed in Britain as the "original mint with a hole". It argued that the public could become confused between the two.
But Lord Justice Aldous, in his judgment with Lord Justice Russell and Lord Justice Saville, said there was nothing in the evidence to suggest that the public would believe that Life Savers were a Nestle sweet.
"They will realise they are a rival product," he said, refusing leave to appeal against a High Court decision earlier this week.
Derek Wilson, joint managing director of Trustin the Foodfinders, the company who hope to import Life Savers, said it was no longer planning to use the line "the original mint with the hole", but reminded Nestle that Savers had been in existence far longer. Looking like lifebelts, the sweet was created in 1912 and given the name because it looked so much like a lifebelt (the first slogan was the considerably less snappy: "For That Stormy Breath").
A spokeswoman for Nestle said last night that the company was "disappointed" that the interim injunction had not been granted, adding: "The action under common law is still pending and we are currently discussing the position with our legal advisers."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments