Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Politics: Unions warn Labour over more reform

Barrie Clement,Fran Abrams
Friday 26 September 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Tony Blair is likely to pass the first real post-election test of his leadership at next week's party conference in Brighton. But Barrie Clement and Fran Abrams discovered serious misgivings over his plan to revolutionise the party. Unions yesterday declared their backing for Tony Blair's radical reforms of the Labour Party, but delivered a strident warning over future change.

The so-called union "barons" said they regarded the new decision-making structure, likely to be endorsed next week at the party conference, as a "settlement" and would oppose further reforms.

The strictures from unions, which still hold half the decision-making votes at the conference, came as delegates gathered in Brighton for the celebratory post-election assembly.

Party leaders were expecting Mr Blair's vision of the party to be endorsed by delegates, but politicians on the left of the party have accused the leadership of manipulating the conference agenda to get the big debate on party reforms over on Monday. The controversial "Partnership in Power" proposals will change Labour's policy-making process, giving such responsibilities to a high-level committee and to a national policy forum.

In an interview with The Independent, the right-wing leader of the Amalgamated Engineering and Electrical Union, declared that the changes to party decision- making processes set out in "Partnership in Power" had gone far enough.

Ken Jackson, general secretary of the AEEU, said bluntly:"It's our party, we founded it and we still fund it. The leadership has needed us in the past and will continue to need us."

Referring to a step-by-step erosion of unions' power over the party, Mr Jackson said: "Our share of conference votes has gone down from more than 90 per cent to 50 per cent and there it must remain."It is known that privately Mr Blair would like to see it decline further.

The warning comes from a union which has traditionally backed the modernisers in the party, but the AEEU has become increasingly disenchanted with the leadership's attitude to the main financial backers.

"We at the AEEU must have given them the equivalent of pounds 18m during the Tory years. The unions in total must have provided the party with a sum in excess of pounds 100m," he said.

As disclosed in The Independent, the AEEU withheld pounds 250,000 in election funding from the party in protest at the leadership's insistence on "parachuting in" middle-class parliamentary candidates at the expense of working people.

Roger Lyons, leader of the MSF manufacturing union, said there should be no more reforms of the party decision-making process in this Parliament. "We are not saying that things will never change again. But we want to retain the federal nature of the party. I know that nearly all of the major union leaders concur."

Monday evening will see the result of Peter Mandelson's bid for a seat on the Party's National Executive Committee (NEC), and it has been suggested that a disappointment for him might affect the Party's mood on reforms with which he has been associated.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in