Politics: MoD seeks war pardons solution
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE Ministry of Defence is preparing the ground for a fudged "pardon" for the 309 men shot for alleged desertion cowardice and other offences against military discipline in the First World War, writes Anthony Bevins.
In an interview on BBC Radio 4's The World this Weekend yesterday, John Reid, the defence minister, said he had been going through the individual case notes, assessing the legal and medical evidence in each case. But there was a difference in the quality of the evidence.
"For instance," he said, "was looking at one case where there is one page foolscap, hand-written. That is the only evidence and, quite frankly, you couldn't make a judgement on that. On others, there is a great deal of evidence. Is it fair that by historical accident, some might be reviewed with a view to pardon, but others condemned by historical accident ... or, is it better to do it generically; to take them as a group?"
Mr Reid then warned that if the 309 were taken as a group, "then there are difficult legal precedents for a pardon". A ministry spokeswoman explained last night that that meant a precedent would be set for future campaigns; that legal pardons might be demanded in spite of the evidence.
In an attempt to offer a possible solution, Mr Reid then added: "It might well be that in order to give the innocent the benefit of the doubt, it would be better as a group to give an expression of a pardon by history, rather than a legal pardon."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments