Politics: But deal set to be rebuffed
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The European Parliament is likely to throw out any compromise deal on tobacco sponsorship thrashed out today, causing potential embarrassment to the British government during its presidency of the European Union.
Last night Ken Collins, a Labour MEP and chairman of the committee with responsibility for public health, said there would be little appetite in the European Parliament for any compromise.
"The Parliament has a history of wanting a ban on tobacco advertising. This is certainly going to be an interesting experience," he said.
Once a deal is struck and the paperwork finalised, probably in January or February, the European Parliament will have three months in which to decide whether to accept it. If MEPs vote to delete the derogation allowing a stay of execution for Formula One, a process of "conciliation" will begin.
This will be particularly embarrassing for Tessa Jowell, the health minister, because under Britain's presidency of the EU she will be pitted against Mr Collins in the negotiations. She will not be in a position to express the British government's own views.
The European Directive under discussion by health ministers today goes back to 1990, but was previously blocked by the Conservative government.
In 1992, an opinion on an earlier version prepared by Mr Collins's committee, the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection Committee, said the "one step at a time" approach then taken by the European Commission was "far too cautious, if not insubstantial, and was an unsatisfactory response."
The Commission was forced to go back and draw up plans for a total ban.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
0Comments