Politics: Blunkett denies cut in education spend
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A ROW over education spending broke yesterday after The Independent reported government figures showing cuts in overall expenditure this year.
In a letter to The Independent, David Blunkett, Secretary of State for Education and Employment, said the report was wrong, and John Prescott, the Deputy Prime Minister, told the Commons that the figures were "not consistent with the truth".
"The total increase for education in 1998-99 over 1997-98 is pounds 1.5bn," Mr Blunkett says. "The figures which [The Independent] quotes fail to include the pounds 2bn student debt sale."
But Don Foster, the Liberal Democrats' education spokesman, said: "The whole thing is smoke and mirrors, and it's about time the whole thing was exposed."
He said Mr Blunkett's own departmental report, published this week, revealed that the amount of money to be received this year from student loan debt sales would amount to pounds 1bn, and the report adds that "the Department surrenders receipts to the [Treasury] Consolidated Fund".
In Commons exchanges, Simon Hughes, the Liberal Democrat MP for Southwark North and Bermondsey, said: "Now that today's Treasury figures show that the Government will in the past year and in the coming year spend less of our national wealth on education than the Tories, isn't it clear that at local level, Labour does not deliver value for money, and at national level, they just don't deliver the money?"
Mr Prescott - standing in for Tony Blair - replied that in its first two years' spending plans, the Government had given more than pounds 2bn to education; much more than the Liberal Democrats promised at the last election, and "certainly more than was envisaged in the expenditure programme of the previous administration".
Letters, page 22
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments