Politics: Ashdown attacks `fantasy tax cuts'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The game of "fantasy tax cuts" played by Labour and the Tories at the last election was attacked by Paddy Ashdown last night.
Calling for a simplification of taxation under which people would be guaranteed the services and standards they would get for their money, the Liberal Democrat leader said in a lecture in London: "One of the characteristics of our age is the strange death of ideology in our politics.
"It's no longer true, as Mr Major tried to convince us before the last election, that `cats miaou, dogs bark and Labour puts up taxes' ... But, equally, it's no longer true that our public services are safe in Labour's hands."
Mr Ashdown said that the first Budget measures by the Chancellor, Gordon Brown, had increased taxes by pounds 36bn over the five-year lifetime of the Parliament. Those tax increases, however, had gone on petrol, tobacco, house sales, pensions and savings - which tended to hit the poorest most badly - because Labour had promised not to increase income tax.
Similarly, for spending, Labour had promised to maintain the Tories' spending limits, and patients and parents were now paying the price of that commitment in spite of the possibility that there was enough money available now for additional investment.
Urging an extension of dedicated taxation, he said specific taxes might be raised for priority spending on nursery education, reducing class sizes, and school books and equipment, but he added that taxpayers themselves should be asked to identify their priorities and preferences.
"We need a new tax settlement to go with the new constitutional settlement," he said. "The two are halves of the same project - the project of giving citizens more power, more control."
- Anthony Bevins
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments