Policies 'must be based on concensus'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.BARRIE CLEMENT
The Trades Union Congress and the Confederation of British Industry both argued yesterday that smoking policies operated by companies should be based on consensus.
Smokers should not suffer discrimination, a TUC spokeswoman said. "People should be paid for the job they do. If a company wants to improve health at work and discourage smoking, they should introduce a no-smoking policy in consultation with union representatives and employees."
The CBI said that any ban on smoking should be based on a majority vote among employees. Policies could range from a complete ban to the provision of special smoking areas. The confederation found in a recent survey that 85 per cent of companies had a policy on the habit. About one-third provided counselling.
Industrial Relations Services, a research group which has conducted extensive surveys on the issue, said companies in America often provided bonuses for people who had given up.
An IRS spokesman, John Ballard,said however that financial penalties for smokers were draconian and would simply anger employees.
Cash prizes for giving up were more acceptable, Mr Ballard said. One pharmaceutical company in Britain had started a "quit and win" campaign. Employees were offered pounds 1 a day for up to 64 days without a cigarette. They were also offered a "secret bonus" if still not smoking after the 64 days.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments