Plutonium dumped off Channel Islands
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Investigations by the Jersey authorities have revealed that thousands of drums of nuclear waste dumped in the sea just north of the Channel Islands contained plutonium, contrary to claims made by the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority.
A report published in Jersey yesterday says there is no immediate health risk to Channel islanders but reveals that the British government has been asked to undertake regular monitoring of the area. The issue is likely to be raised in discussions with the Home Office next week.
More than 58,000 drums filled with nuclear waste from sites such as Harwell and Aldermaston were dumped 10 miles north of Alderney between 1950 and 1963 in an area known as the Hurd Deep.
The UK authorities had claimed that all the drums imploded as they sank, dispersing their contents, but the Jersey investigations have revealed that more than 2,900 drums were sealed in concrete and still lie 150 metres beneath the surface.
The new evidence was discovered by the island's environmental adviser, Dr Mike Romerill, while searching through files held at the UKAEA headquarters at Harwell and the Public Records Office at Kew.
"Some drums disposed of in 1951 contained plutonium/polonium-contaminated laboratory waste, probably from Aldermaston," said Dr Romerill. "While such disposal was permissible at the time, such plutonium-contaminated waste would no longer be considered as "low level'" and would be disposed of deep underground."
That the UK authorities gave contradictory information about the waste dumped in the Hurd Deep has been confirmed by Sir John Knill, the former chairman of the Radioactive Waste Management Advisory Committee, who assisted Dr Romerill in his investigation.
"A visit to the Public Records Office confirmed the presence of plutonium- contaminated wastes which would not, at the present day, be regarded as "low level waste," said Sir John. "This is contrary to the explicit oral statement we received at the UKAEA in July 1996 to the effect that "no material disposed of would, under the current regulations, be considered to be intermediate level waste."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments