Perils of downloading porn at work
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.MALE OFFICE workers who downloaded pornography from the Internet have fallen victim to a whole range of new offences under cyber law.
The men were found to have sexually harassed a female colleague even though the material was not aimed at her.
An employment tribunal found that the men had created a hostile working environment and that the employers were liable to pay damages.
In another example of a growing caseload of computer law, a company was found to have dismissed a man unfairly for accessing sexually explicit images on his screen.
The tribunal in south London decided that the man's summary dismissal was unlawful because it was by no means clear that he had breached company policy.
Predictably, in the United States computer misuse is thought to be on the verge of creating a multi-billion-dollar business for lawyers.
One gay man is trying to sue an Internet provider because he contracted Aids from a lover he met through the Net.
In a report on "cyberliability' published today, the research group Incomes Data Services warns employees and employers to beware the legal pitfalls of computer misuse.
A casual e-mail can constitute a legally enforceable document. In one case, an agreement between a line manager and a subordinate over the payment of expenses was deemed to constitute a binding contract and the company was obliged to pay the agreed amount.
Robert Pullen, author of the research, warned against the risk of libelling colleagues through the use of e-mail. And he said employers should beware of the legal issues involved in monitoring e-mail correspondence and Internet use.
Mr Pullen urged organisations to adopt carefully drafted policies to prevent employees and management straying into the "minefield of legal hazards" created by unfettered use of computers and electronic media.
"What is becoming clear is employers must take steps to deal with the problem of how to maximise the advantages which giving employees access to the Internet and e-mail can bring, while minimising the associated legal risks and practical hazards."
He said that enforcing a legally sound computer usage policy would do much to resolve the problem. "Such policies will not in themselves be sufficient to put the new cyberliability lawyers out of business, but they will definitely help to keep them at bay."
#Staff who browse the Internet for holidays, to help their children with homework, to search financial websites or send messages to friends are threatening office productivity.
A growing number of companies are banning staff from casual surfing or restricting Internet use by devices that flash warnings on to the screen if curious employees try to access prohibited sites.
Recent studies show workers could be wasting up to two hours a day on the Net. In a business with 1,000 staff, the cost of surfing could add up to nearly pounds 4m a year.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments