Tony Blair: Britain and US ‘profoundly’ underestimated chaos brought about by toppling of Saddam Hussein regime
Former PM offers no apology for the intervention in Iraq just weeks before the publication of the long-awaited Chilcot Report into the war, and suggests the West should be prepared to put boots on the ground in the Middle East again if it wants to defeat Isis
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Britain and America “profoundly” underestimated the chaos that would be unleashed by the toppling of Saddam Hussein, Tony Blair has admitted, in one of his starkest expressions of regret over the Iraq War.
With the long-awaited Chilcot Inquiry report into the war due to be published within weeks, Mr Blair said that the West had not foreseen the “forces of destabilisation” that fill the vacuum left by the dictator’s fall.
However, he offered no apology for the intervention to topple the Iraqi dictator, and suggested that the West should be prepared to put boots on the ground in the Middle East again if it wanted to defeat Isis.
Speaking at an event hosted by Prospect magazine, the former Prime Minister said: “We underestimated profoundly the forces that were at work in the region and that would take advantage of the change once you topple the regime.
“That's the lesson. The lesson is not actually complicated, the lesson is simple - it's that.
“It's that when you remove a dictator, out come these forces of destabilisation - whether al-Qeada on the Sunni side or Iran and its militia on the other side.”
However, he suggested that the Middle East would not be better off today were Saddam Hussein still in power.
“There is a line today that's very common in western discourse, left and right, that says 'you know what, it would be better that these dictators stay in power',” he said. “I don't personally agree with it, but it doesn't matter if I agree with it or I don't. Wat the Arab Spring shows you is these countries with young populations, with radical forces operating within them, are not going to accept that.”
Mr Blair did not comment on the Chilcot Report, which is due to be published in July, but his comments give a strong indication of his likely response to its findings. The report is expected to be particularly critical of planning for the conflict’s aftermath, which saw Iraq descend into a bloody civil war, incubating the extremist forces which went on to establish Isis.
Mr Blair said that defeating the group, which controls major cities and swathes of territory in both Iraq and Syria, could require Western ground forces supporting local troops.
“You have got to defeat these people on the ground,” he said. “The armed forces of America, the UK, France, other major countries have both experience and capability so even if we are using them in support of local forces, you have just got to decide what our objective… Is our objective to defeat this enemy? My answer to that is yes.”
He said that Western governments needed to be “honest with our public” about what it would take to defeat the group.
“In my view, defeating them is absolutely fundamental because if we don't defeat them they are going to come and attack us here. This is not someone else's fight, it is our fight as well,” he said.
He said it was important that Libya was not ceded to the militant group, and that if they were not dealt with “they will come and attack us here”.
“We cannot afford to have Isis govern a large part of Libya – we shouldn't be in any doubt they need to be taken on on the ground,” he said.
Ground forces currently fighting Isis in the Levant are mostly Kurdish, Iraqi government, Syrian government and other militant groups.
In Libya, where the group controls the central port city of Sirte, domestic Libyan forces have contained its advances beyond that area.
The UK is currently involved in a coalition of nations conducting air strikes against the so-called Islamic State in Syria and Iraq.
Isis has been losing ground in the Levant in recent months, with Iraqi government forces now advancing on the city of Fallujah, which the group holds.
Mr Blair has previously called for Western ground forces to be used against Islamist militant groups. In an article for The Sunday Times in March he said they were “necessary” to beat Isis.
“We must build military capability able to confront and defeat the terrorists wherever they try to hold territory,” he wrote at the time.
“This is not just about local forces. It is a challenge for the West. Ground forces are necessary to win this fight and ours are the most capable.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments