Taylor Swift criticised by photographers for ‘exceedingly restrictive’ copyright demands
You won't find a photo of Taylor Swift in the Irish Times today, as they refused the demands of her label regarding photo copyright and chose not to print any
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Irish Times has refused to print pictures of Taylor Swift due to her team’s restrictive contract and ridiculous demands regarding copyright.
The singer was performing at Dublin’s 3Arena last night as part of her 1989 World Tour.
In a piece on the website, the paper's deputy picture editor Brenda Fitzsimons said the terms and conditions are "exceedingly restrictive" and "not feasible for a working newspaper and website".
Photographers covering one of the singer’s shows must sign contracts which outline restrictions regarding what they can and cannot do with pictures of the pop star on stage.
Swift’s photograph authorisation has a one-time-only limit, which elapses at the end of 2015. Any other use requires written consent from the artist and her agent, and Swift has the sole right to use any of these materials herself for publicity and promotion in future.
The paper has rejected the demands, saying they’d rather print no picture of her at all.
Swift's argument, it seems, is that people could use these images and make their own unofficial merchandise for their own profit – something the pop star has sued her fans for in the past.
The irony, the paper points out, is that Swift is treating the photographers at her shows in much the same way she believed Apple were treating their artists.
“The photographs may be used on a one-time only basis, and by signing her contract we grant Swift perpetual, worldwide right to use the published photographs in any way she sees fit," adds Fitzsimons.
While she was taking on Apple over their royalty policy last week, one photographer wrote an open letter to her which quickly went viral, pointing out how damaging her team’s restrictive policies are.
"“With all due respect to you too Taylor, you can do the right thing and change your photo policy. Photographers don't ask for your music for free. Please don't ask us to provide you with your marketing material for free," Sheldon said.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments