Kensington Palace defends Prince Harry's statement criticising media coverage of girlfriend Meghan Markle
An editorial in The Sun called the Prince's statement 'ill-judged' and told him to 'get real'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Kensington Palace has defended the statement issued by Prince Harry which warned “a line of has been crossed” in the treatment of his new girlfriend Meghan Markle by the media.
In an extraordinary statement, the Prince, 32, denounced the “wave of abuse and harassment” aimed at his girlfriend, an actress known for her role in Suits. He condemned "the smear on the front page of a national newspaper, the racial undertones of comment pieces and the outright sexism and racism of social media trolls and web article comments”.
He also spoke of “nightly legal battles” and allegations reporters and photographers tried to gain illegal access into her home and harassed her mother, ex-boyfriend, and friends.
While Prince Harry was widely praised for protecting his girlfriend and slamming the ‘racist’ and ‘sexist’ undertones of some of the press reporting, some sections of the media were unmoved by his statement, claiming it was “ill-judged” or “misguided”.
A source close to the palace told The Guardian they did not accept these arguments and maintained the statement stemmed from his want to primarily protect Markle, not himself.
“He was asking to protect someone else and their privacy, someone he has been in a relationship with for a few months,” they said. “This was a debate happening in public being encouraged by a handful of papers and he has added his voice to that and went straight to the public.”
An editorial from The Sun urged him to “get real”, something the Prince's statement anticipated when he said “he knows commentators will say this is "the price she has to pay" and that "this is all part of the game".
“The UK press isn’t to blame for his most serious allegations. The Sun aides by strict rules against intrusion and harassment – and we agree Meghan shouldn’t be hounded,” the paper said.
Similarly Sarah Vine in the Daily Mail labelled the Prince’s claims “preposterous” and said the statement was “misguided”.
“The fact is that both Harry and Meghan are public figures, one through inheritance, the other through choice – and that comes at a price,” she wrote.
Even Nigel Farage, who has resurfaced after Donald Trump’s shock election win, weighed in, telling The Mail: “Lashing out in a statement is not always a good idea. It’s probably best he doesn’t say anything at all! It’s not worth it in the end.”
Neil Wallis, the former deputy editor of the now-defunct News of the World called it “a terrible misjudgement by the palace” and told Radio 4 it was “an unwarranted attack on press freedom”.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments