Obituary: Lord Hatch of Lusby
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.DURING the 40 years I knew John Hatch I always respected him but was like everyone else often irritated by him, writes Lord Campbell of Eskan (further to the obituary by Lord Jenkins of Putney, 13 October).
We usually sat next to each other at the back of the Labour Benches in the House of Lords. When I was made a Life Peer in 1966 his 'congratulatory' letter said that he was surprised that I should have accepted membership of so reactionary an assembly. When he was himself ennobled I wrote that I didn't know whether he remembered what he'd written to me but that I wholeheartedly congratulated their Lordships on his joining them.
He was, as Hugh Jenkins writes, a man of complete integrity and a man with deep and unswerving convictions and sense of commitment, especially about the Third World. He was untiring - even after heart surgery - in his homework before he made a speech in the House or after questions. The questions he asked always needed asking and the things he said always needed saying.
He turned the government front bench purple with anger when he pressed his questions and often irritated his colleagues - but his apparent insensitivity, and what must have seemed like bad manners to many of us on all sides of the House, were a symptom of his moral courage and his own conviction that he was right - which he almost always was.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments