Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Obituary: John Piper

Hugo Brunner
Thursday 02 July 1992 00:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE ENTRY in Who's Who for John Piper begins: 'Painter and writer; Member of the Oxford Diocesan Advisory Committee for the Care of Churches'. Piper's willingness to promote a good purpose by serving on a committee deserves a mention, writes Hugo Brunner. Long service on the Oxford DAC, of which John Betjeman was also a member, entailed attendance at monthly meetings and numerous visits to churches. He made time for both, to the enrichment or cherishing of many a lovely building - and the entertainment of his fellow committee-members.

His affection for the churches of Oxfordshire was also shown in putting his work as painter and writer at the disposal of the Oxford Historic Churches Trust. He was a wonderful writer on churches, conveying brilliantly what he had learned and what he saw. On Dorchester Abbey for example, in Oxfordshire: a Shell Guide:

The architectural history of this great church is complicated, but the total effect is of a majestic decorated building that has been much loved and used, much neglected, mutilated and restored (Butterfield and Scott were both called in by the Victorians) but that originally had such richness and excellence of workmanship that nothing - time, weather or man - could spoil it.

(Photograph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in