Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Lord Alan Sugar receives £20,000 payout after Daily Mail article calling him a ‘spiv’

The business mogul plans to donate the money to charity 

Heather Saul
Friday 08 July 2016 13:43 BST
Comments
Alan Sugar
Alan Sugar (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Lord Alan Sugar has received a £20,000 payment from the Daily Mail after the newspaper printed a "clarification" over an article calling him a “spiv”.

The Apprentice star posed with a picture of a fake lottery-style ‘cheque’ on Twitter for £20,000, which is 'signed' by Paul Dacre, the newspaper's editor.

Lord Sugar said he would donate the money to Great Ormond Street Hospital in London.

In a clarification published on Monday, the Mail said: “An article published on 26 May described Lord Sugar as a ‘spiv’. This word may be understood to describe a person who is dishonest in his business dealings. We are happy to confirm that this was not the intended meaning, as indeed the article stated he is honest and hard working.”

The Independent understands the Mail made the voluntary payment to cover Lord Sugar’s legal fees on the basis that a proportion was donated to charity.

The Mail declined to comment.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in