JK Rowling says Harry Potter ‘would be disappointed’ with her stance on Israel boycott
The author explains her stance after fans claimed she had 'ruined their childhood'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.JK Rowling has said she knows that Harry Potter would be “disappointed” in her decision not to support a cultural boycott of Israel, but has dismissed comparisons between the country to the ‘Death Eaters’ in her books.
The author published the lengthly post on Twitlonger after it was claimed she was a “zionist” for signing Culture for Coexistence’s plea not to boycott Israeli products.
Some fans tweeted that their childhood was “ruined” after hearing the news, with some comparing her to Potter's archenemy in the series, Voldemort.
Rowling said in the post that she appreciated “talking wouldn’t stop the Wizarding War’ and that “Boycotting Israel on every possible front has its allure" but argued cutting off the cultural and academic community entirely would even silence those critical of Israel’s government.
She admits that although the Harry Potter of the first six and a half books would not understand her stance it did not necessarily invalidate it.
“Among the messages drawing parallels between the Potter books and Israel have been quite a few saying that 'Harry would be disappointed' or 'Harry wouldn't understand' my position,” she writes.
“Those people are right, but only up to a clearly defined point. The Harry of six and a half books might not understand.
“Harry is reckless and angry for a considerable portion of those six and a half books, and he has my whole-hearted sympathy,” says Rowling, who goes on to suggest that by the end of the seven-book franchise he would have a greater understanding of her argument.
“The Palestinian community has suffered untold injustice and brutality. I want to see the Israeli government held to account for that injustice and brutality,” she writes.
But she adds that there “are voices I’d like to hear amplified, not silenced” and a cultural boycott would “place immovable barriers between [artists who] work side-by-side for peace.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments