Germaine Greer: Replacing male leaders with women would not make the world a better place
'Simply substituting men with women wouldn't cut it'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Germaine Greer has warned simply replacing male leaders with women would not be enough to make the world a “safer, kinder, happier place” because those who reach senior positions would likely just behave as men in male dominated environments do.
The feminist academic and author addressed the efficacy of placing women in senior positions to improve the world during an appearance at the Telegraph Festival of Education.
In a discussion about how best to engender equality, Greer recalled being questioned about whether the world would be a “better place” if women were running it and answering “no”.
Greer said this was a position she still stood by.
“Having a world run by women is not the same as having a world run by, say, feminists or socialists or peacenicks,” she explained.
“It's just women, any old women, Mrs Thatcher type women, the most belligerent leader Britain has probably ever had.
“Not that we can't be bellicose. We can. But if what you want to do is make the world a safer, kinder, happier place then simply substituting men with women wouldn't cut it.”
She said quotas for introducing a certain amount of women onto male-only boards were largely redundant because the women who did make it to the boardroom were unlikely to be “hell raisers” who would challenge the status quo and make a difference. Instead, she argued they would behave like the men do in order to fit in.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments