Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Diary: Will Marr make up for his past indiscretions?

 

Andy McSmith
Wednesday 01 February 2012 01:00 GMT
Comments
Marr has been scathing in his criticism of the royals in the past
Marr has been scathing in his criticism of the royals in the past (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

As we eagerly await the start on Monday of Andrew Marr's three-part BBC1 series The Diamond Queen, in honour of Her Majesty's 60 years on the throne, I hope he does not poop the party by giving airtime to one particular pundit. I mean the one who, in 1995, wrote these insulting words about the monarch's nearest and dearest: "Here is not the place to recount in full or even full summary the sordid and self-destructive exhibitionism of the younger air-headed Windsors, the sexual secrets spilled out, the marital misery publicised, the open acknowledgement of betrayal and bed-hopping..."

"Where will this process end," the same pundit asked. "In a republic? The idea is gaining ground ... A visceral dislike of the whole monarchical business is widespread among younger voters..."

I quote from pages 232 and 233 of Ruling Britannia: The Failure and Future of British Democracy, by Andrew Marr.

Traditional Tories fail to see sense

A number of backbench Tory MPs from marginal seats, such as Anna Soubry from Broxtowe and Jessica Lee from Erewash, have got together this month to form a pressure group, the 301 Group, to promote the kind of Conservatism that talks more about "modern" issues such as the environment than about the traditional battle hymns – Europe and immigration. The initiative has annoyed some on the Tory right. It would have annoyed them more if the group had stuck to its original choice of name. They were going to call themselves "Sensible Tories".

Agutter likes a man rough and ready

David Cameron is too smooth and unruffled, says Jenny Agutter, of Railway Children fame. When asked the standard question "who would you change channel to avoid?" for an interview in next week's Radio Times, the actress, pictured, 59, replies: "Our Prime Minister. It's just that thing of seeing someone who doesn't seem to belong to the world they're talking about ... I want a man with such a difficult job to look a bit more tired and rough."

£1,100 claim for 23-minute meeting

Tory councillors in Crawley, West Sussex, feared that the old system that allowed them to claim an allowance for each minute of attendance at council meetings was an incentive to hold pointless meetings – so they brought in flat-rate allowances instead.

This worked out rather well for Cllr Jennifer Millar-Smith, the wife of Crawley's MP Henry Smith. She took the chair of the parking enforcement scrutiny panel, which was set up to deal with inconsiderate parking but met only once, last November, before being wound up. Mrs Millar-Smith's flat-rate payment for that 23-minute meeting was £1,133.

"Jennifer is a hard-working councillor and she was extremely efficient with this panel in getting the work done," the council leader, Bob Lanzer, told This Is Sussex.

Horsey parents whip Blunkett into shape

Listeners to yesterday's Today programme on BBC Radio 4 heard a spirited defence of vocational qualifications from the former Education Secretary, David Blunkett. He warned against a "wholesale trashing" of vocational subjects and, as for the course in horse training mentioned several times during the programme, Mr Blunkett speculated that it was available only to the over-16s, but invited listeners to correct him if he was wrong. "Let's not make things up," were his final words.

But oh dear, Mr Blunkett had inadvertently made up that bit about horse training – a course which some schools teach from age 14 upwards. Numerous parents rang the BBC to say it was a valuable course. Mr Blunkett came back on to say: "Whoops, sorry about that – that'll teach me."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in