Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Chess

William Hartson
Tuesday 28 February 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The final of the British Chess Solving Championship, held at Oakham School, Rutland, earlier this month, ended in victory for David Friedgood, ahead of last year's champion Jonathan Mestel. For the first time the title had gone to a specialist problemist (who is also a very strong player) rather than a grandmaster (who is also a very keen problemist).

The contest comprised five rounds. After easing into the competition with three mate-in-two problems to solve in 20 minutes, contestants were then allowed 50 minutes for a 3-mover and a 5-mover, then 35 minutes for an endgame study, 30 minutes for two self-mates (where White plays first and forces Black to give mate), and finishing with two helpmates (both sides conspire to reach a mating position in the specified number of moves).

Friedgood dropped only one point, omitting one variation from the complete solution of one of the self-mates. For the lesser contestants, one of the two-movers produced unexpected difficulties.

The diagram position - White to play and mate in two - was composed by F Salazar in 1969. The difficulty lies in the number of tempting tries for White and the ingenuity of Black's defences.

x , , ,

, ,D,H,g

,Hn , V

Bd,hz ,

, V B ,

Z , ,H,

, CHNg,

, , , X

With Black's king almost surrounded, White has only to engineer a check and it will be mate. Even 1.Qxg2 (far too crude to be the intended solution) almost works with its threats of 2.Ng4 or 2.Qg5, but 1...Qg8! denies White a mate at move two.

After a brief look at 1.Qh2 (which would be a fine idea if it actually threatened anything) we soon home in on the idea of Rf5, which would be mate but for the reply Kxd4. That thought produces a string of candidate moves: e3, Be3, Bc3, Qa1, Nc2, Nb3, Nxb5, Ne6 and Ndf5 all threaten Rf5 mate but only one of them works.

Black's stock defensive move is Bd3, which works against 1.e3 or 1.Be3. If you discover why it does not work against some of the other moves, you'll be well on the way to a solution. Otherwise you'd best wait until tomorrow.

William Hartston

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in