Celebrity injunction: Privacy order protecting couple lifted by Court of Appeal
The couple is now expected to lodge an appeal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An injunction barring a tabloid newspaper from naming a celebrity said to have engaged in “extramarital activities” can be lifted, judges have ruled, but they have not named the man involved, who is now expected to ask for a stay pending further legal action.
In January, judges at London’s Court of Appeal granted an injunction barring The Sun on Sunday and other media outlets from printing details about a “three-way sexual encounter” involving a man named in court papers as PJS.
Lawyers for the newspaper returned to court to ask judges to review the Court of Appeal’s decision on Friday and three judges decided to lift it today.
However, PJS still cannot be named pending legal action from him and the story cannot be published until an appeal has been heard. His lawyers are asking for permission to take the case to the Supreme Court.
In their initial ruling granting the privacy order, judges said identifying the man and his partner and publishing the story would be “devastating” for him and would “generate a media storm”, which would, in turn, make their young children the subject of increased media attention.
“There would be increased press interest in the claimant's and YMA's family life,” the ruling said. “The children would become the subject of increased press attention, with all that that entails. Furthermore, even if the children do not suffer harassment in the short-term, they are bound to learn about these matters from school friends and the internet in due course.”
Lawyers representing the Sun on Sunday had asked for the injunction to be lifted because the man - who is described as being in the entertainment business and in a relationship with someone who is also a well-known individual in the same business - has been named by publications in the US, Scotland and other countries. The injunction only applies in England and Wales.
The injunction was the first to reach the Court of Appeal for five years.
Additional reporting by Press Association
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.