Celebrity injunction: British actor protected by order named in US
Judges put an injunction in place to prevent a tabloid from naming the actor in 2011
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A US publication has named an actor who took out an injunction to prevent a British tabloid from identifying him in a story about his alleged sexual activity with a sex worker.
The actor, who is married, allegedly paid £195 to have sex with Helen Wood, a former escort, in 2010.
The man secured the injunction in 2011 after High Court judges agreed it violated his right to privacy. A decision was made at a later date to allow the media to identify Ms Wood.
He was described by judges in the initial hearing as a “world famous celebrity”. Justices had ruled he had a reasonable expectation that his alleged activities would remain private.
While the man has been named in the US, the injunction is still in place in the UK and he cannot be named here.
Meanwhile, judges at London’s Supreme Court are considering whether an injunction protecting a celebrity from being named by The Sun on Sunday in a report about his alleged “extra-marital activities” should be lifted. The man, named in court documents as PJS, has been identified by publications in the US, Scotland, Australia and by a political blogger. The newspaper asked for the order to be withdrawn after he was named in these publications, and High Court judges ruled in their favour.
The man argued he has a right to privacy. His spouse, named in documents as YMA, is also described as a well-known figure.
Supreme Court president Lord Neuberger said the court would “take time to consider this matter” on April 21 and return with a decision as soon as possible. The injunction remains in place until then.