Peerage for Stevens fuels crony row
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.TONY BLAIR was embroiled in a new patronage row yesterday over his decision to overrule a parliamentary watchdog and directly nominate Sir John Stevens for the House of Lords.
The Prime Minister dismissed the concerns of the House of Lords Appointments Commission and personally recommended the outgoing Metropolitan Police chief to the Queen for ennoblement.
The commission said it did not object to Sir John becoming an independent peer but added that his direct nomination raised questions about the Prime Minister's use of powers of patronage. Sir John's predecessor at the Metropolitan Police, Paul Condon, was made a cross-bench peer after a long selection process.
Traditionally the Prime Minister has restricted direct nominations to the cross-benches to a small number of distinguished figures such as the Archbishop of Canterbury.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments