Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Parliament: Standards: Labour MP and wife rebuked for expenses claims

Fran Abrams Westminster Correspondent
Friday 26 November 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE PARLIAMENTARY sleaze watchdog called for tighter controls on MPs' expenses yesterday as a senior Labour member was rebuked for claiming pounds 3,700 to which he was not entitled.

MPs should be subjected to the same checks as public sector employees, said Elizabeth Filkin, the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards.

Bruce George, the chairman of the Defence Select Committee, was criticised for his wife's mileage expenses and over payments he made to her for secretarial work. An investigation by Ms Filkin found Mr George's wife, Lisa, had failed to pay tax or national insurance "for some years" until 1997, when the parliamentary fees office took over administration of the payments. Mrs George had also claimed mileage payments entitled to MPs' wives but had failed to mention that the car was a company one, on which she should have claimed a reduced rate.

MPs can claim an office-costs allowance of pounds 50,264 a year and mileage at a rate of 51p per mile. They "self-certify" the miles they drive and no further checks are made.

Ms Filkin said the system left honest MPs exposed to false allegations as well as making it impossible to investigate such claims fully. There should be a proper audit trail, she said. "I believe it would protect MPs because the vast majority of them do their expense claims scrupulously and if they get a complaint against them there is no way of checking because there is no certification," she said.

The Committee on Standards and Privileges recommended that no further action be taken, but warned that "members should take care to ensure that their expense claims are accurate".

Mr George said Ms Filkin's investigation had been fair and had not found him guilty of any wrong-doing. "I fully accept the judgement that I was insufficiently careful in two of my office procedures. It was a genuine mistake." Mr Bruce said he had repaid the mileage expenses and his wife was waiting for the Inland Revenue to tell her how much she owes it.

Norman Baker, the Liberal Democrat MP for Lewes, questioned ministers on the issue and found that MPs claimed an average of pounds 5,000 each last year for car travel. Some were receiving as much as pounds 230 per week, he found, and the total cost was pounds 3m per year. "This is excessive and it encourages MPs to drive long distances to the Commons rather than taking the train," Mr Baker said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in