Parliament: Nuclear waste - Lords urge new dumping policy
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PEERS YESTERDAY urged the Government to end its "fragmented" policy on dealing with nuclear waste.
A report by the influential Lords' committee on science and technology argued that phased underground disposal was "the right way forward" to deal with the waste.
"Nuclear waste has been treated in an ad hoc way for far too long There are wastes for which no long-term management method has been identified and there are radioactive materials in store that are not needed but that have yet to be classified... reliance on supervision for very long periods increases the probability of human error," Lord Tombs, the committee's chairman, said.
The peers' inquiry was set up after the decision in 1997 by the then Tory environment secretary, John Gummer, to reject Nirex's plans to build the first stage of Britain's underground nuclear waste dump near Sellafield, Cumbria. He also turned down British Nuclear Fuel's plans to keep foreign intermediate-level nuclear wastes in Britain after their reprocessing.
The report also said: "We must start now to find a solution to this unprecedented problem."
But Greenpeace dismissed the committee as a "pack of ostriches". "Dumping nuclear waste underground is irresponsible," said Dr Helen Wallace, a Greenpeace scientist. "Evidence at the Nirex inquiry showed that any dump would leak and contaminate land, rivers and water supplies."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments