Parliament: Health: GP reforms debate may run for hours
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.MPS WERE digging in for a possible late-night sitting last night over the Government's health reforms.
The Commons has 23 groups of amendments to the health Bill to consider during the detailed report stage. But it took three hours of debate to deal with the first set of amendments.
Conservative backbenchers, buoyed by yesterday's Euro-election results, made a series of lengthy speeches on aspects of the legislation.
David Amess (C Southend West) spoke for more than an hour - prompting Labour's Malcolm Chisholm (Edinburgh North and Leith) to accuse him of "time-wasting self-indulgence".
The Bill scraps GP fundholding, introduced by the previous Tory government, and replaces them with primary care trusts.
Ministers suffered three defeats on the legislation during its passage through the Lords.
Government business managers had scheduled the Bill for last night's sitting only to complete its remaining Commons stages. At the current rate of progress, the whips were facing the choice of sitting into the night or moving to "guillotine" debate and having a second day on the Bill.
In an intervention, Dr Evan Harris, for the Liberal Democrats, commented on the lengthy speeches of the Tories, saying there was "something going on in this report stage" debate.
Philip Hammond, for the opposition, said any "chagrin" on the Tory benches was due to the Government allowing only one day's debate on the report stage. His party believed this was wholly inadequate, he declared.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments