Paper rebuked on story about Blair daughter
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A COMPLAINT by Tony and Cherie Blair about a newspaper report regarding their daughter Kathryn's schooling was upheld last night by the Press Complaints Commission.
After the first-ever complaint by a prime minister, the watchdog rebuked the Mail on Sunday over claims that 10-year-old Kathryn had received preferential treatment in the couple's choice of school. The article breached the PCC's new code of practice, which says young people should be free to complete their time at school without unnecessary intrusion.
Downing Street said it was a "landmark judgement" that would help give the children of famous people the same protection as non-famous children.
The Mail on Sunday's story, published in January, claimed that Kathryn had been given special treatment in being admitted to a Roman Catholic girls' comprehensive, the Sacred Heart School in Hammersmith, west London, from this autumn.
But the PCC said it "could find no justification for naming Kathryn Blair alone in connection with complaints about the admission criteria of the school. There was no evidence of special treatment in her favour." It said the article about the school's selection procedure could have been written without reference to Kathryn or by making her the centre of the story. "By herself, she could have been no more responsible for denying a place to the large number of unsuccessful candidates than any of the other girls actually admitted who equally could have been individually highlighted by the articles."
The PCC concluded that the newspaper had reproduced allegations "potentially damaging to a child in a misleading way without evidence of special treatment in her case".
"There was no evidence to support the allegation that Kathryn Blair was unfairly admitted or had received special treatment, and the newspaper did not provide any."
Last night a spokesman for the Prime Minister said: "The Prime Minister and Mrs Blair welcome this ruling. They hope it will ensure that their children and the children of other public figures will in future enjoy the same right to complete their schooling in privacy to which all children are entitled."
The Mail on Sunday said it published the articles in the "deeply-held belief that they raised important issues about Labour's education policies. We defended them because we strongly believe that the press should be free to report such matters," the newspaper said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments