Overcrowded train line refuses to add any extra carriages
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A TRAIN company with one of the worst punctuality records sparked an outcry yesterday when it said it could not justify investing more money to relieve overcrowding.
Connex said it wanted to add two carriages to trains on its two southern England franchises, but said there was "no commercial case" for it to invest in upgrading the track to cater for the longer trains.
It hinted that the only way for it to do this would be through "approval and support" -- if the Government agreed to extend its franchise, thereby enabling it to recoup the investment, or paid for the work. Connex said it would cost pounds 20m-pounds 30m to upgrade the track on its SouthEastern franchise, serving Kent and parts of Sussex, to allow it to run 12-car trains.
It has not costed the improvements needed to run 10-car trains on its SouthCentral franchise in Sussex and Surrey although it is likely this would be more expensive. A spokesman said: "It would be difficult to justify the investment purely on commercial grounds but it would give an enormous capacity increase. There are other benefits such as meeting the anticipated rise in peak demand."
Sir Alan Greengross, chairman of the London Regional Passengers Committee, said: "There is very little that most of the operators are doing that gives us enough confidence that they should get to carry on for another five years.
"Most passengers are appalled that anyone could get a new contract when they want the present contracts taken away from them. Passengers will find this totally inexplicable." SouthEastern was given a D grade for running 16 per cent of its trains late in 1998 and SouthCentral a C, where 10 per cent ran late.
It has a 15-year franchise on SouthEastern and has already had a bid to extend its seven-year SouthCentral contract rejected. Connex is understood to be furious with the new grading system, which takes no account of the fact that it runs the most intensively used railway in Europe.
It believes it has delivered lower fares, more train services and an increase in passengers - all at a time when its taxpayer subsidy is falling. Great North Eastern Railway sparked a similar row when it said it would buy 10 new trains in exchange for an extension. Its chief executive Chris Garnett also angered Virgin by saying GNER should have its franchise extended to show other operators how to run a proper railway. It said it deserved to have its seven-year franchise extended.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments