Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Outcast women in Lords victory

Ian Burrell
Friday 26 March 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE HOUSE of Lords ruled yesterday that Pakistani women have the right to refugee status in Britain because they collectively suffer persecution from Pakistani men. The ground-breaking ruling by the law lords means that women who become outcasts in Pakistani society after being accused of adultery can seek asylum in Britain.

Two Pakistani women living in London brought the case after being driven into exile by false accusations. Syeda Shah, 43, came to Britain in 1992 with her child after her husband named her as an adulteress. Shahanna Islam, 45, a former Pakistani schoolteacher, fled after a militant political group began spreading rumours that she was unfaithful to her husband.

They argued that Pakistan's Islamic law classifies adultery as a criminal offence, known as Zina, punishable by imprisonment, public flogging or stoning.

The two women, who were supported by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, argued that they were legitimate refugees under the definition contained in the UN Convention on Refugees of 1951.

They argued that they had a well-founded fear of persecution as a member of a particular social group, namely women, who experience discrimination and oppression because they occupy a lower status to men in Pakistani society.

The law lords accepted their argument by a majority of four to one.

Hannana Siddiqui, of the women's group Southall Black Sisters, described the verdict as "enlightened". She said: "We have many other women who have suffered similarly and we hope that they will now be given the protection of British asylum law."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in