Organ donor policy change is rejected
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE GOVERNMENT yesterday rejected demands for a review of the organ donation system. The Health minister John Hutton told the Commons that the incidence of surviving relatives ignoring someone's approval to donate their organs after death was less than 1 per cent.
He also said he was "not convinced" that introducing a system presuming people had consented to donate, unless they carried cards opting out, would solve the organ shortage.
The Liberal Democrat health spokesman Dr Evan Harris, opening a short debate, said the "racist" donation row and the case of the 15-year-old girl forced to have a heart transplant highlighted the issue's importance.
He called on the Government to consider changes to the system if evidence suggested that the organ shortage could be reduced. One proposal was a review of families' right to veto express wishes to donate organs made by relatives before they died.
Dr Harris (Oxford West and Abingdon) said: "There is a question about whether the law is clear in this area and certainly the British Medical Association have long had policy questioning whether it's appropriate for ... the person whose organs are in question, whether the wishes of that person should be overruled by relatives."
He also urged a fresh look at the system of "presumed consent" and argued it should replace the current "opt-in" system of donor cards. People would then be presumed to be giving their consent unless they registered that they did not.
He said that about 70 per cent of the population had expressed a willingness to donate but only 17 to 18 per cent carried cards. There was a "chunk of people in the middle whose views are not known, where the majority are likely to be in favour" and relatives are asked to "second-guess at a very difficult time" their loved ones' views.
Earlier, outside the House, Dr Harris commented on the case of child M - who had her wishes not to have a life-saving heart transplant overturned in court.
"It's never an easy call for a judge to make but in this case I think that we must welcome the decision to save the life of this critically ill girl," he said.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments