Panel recommends 5 new federal judgeships for Oklahoma
A judicial panel is recommending the creation of five additional federal judgeships in Oklahoma because of an increased caseload due to a U.S. Supreme Court ruling regarding crimes committed on tribal lands
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A judicial panel has recommended the creation of five additional federal judgeships in Oklahoma because of an increased caseload due to a U.S. Supreme Court ruling regarding crimes committed on tribal lands.
The Judicial Conference on Tuesday published the recommendation that Congress create three new judgeships in the Eastern District of Oklahoma, based in Muskogee, and two in the state’s Northern District, based in Tulsa
In what is known as the McGirt decision, the Supreme Court ruled that only federal and tribal courts have jurisdiction over major crimes committed on tribal lands by or against Native Americans.
“This (ruling) caused the number of criminal cases filed in the Eastern District of Oklahoma to jump more than 400 percent and the Northern District of Oklahoma to increase by nearly 200 percent from 2020 to 2021,” according to the recommendation.
The Judicial Conference is the policy-making body for the federal court system and is chaired by the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, John Roberts
Gov. Kevin Stitt who wants the McGirt decision overturned, has called the ruling the greatest issue facing the state.
“Governor Stitt welcomes the federal government’s acknowledgment that there is a public safety crisis in Oklahoma, but more judges does not solve the fundamental issue of McGirt," Stitt spokesperson Carly Atchison said in a statement.
“The bottom line remains that Oklahoma has been stripped of one of the most basic functions of a state, which is the ability to enforce the rule of law,” according to the statement.
State Attorney General John O'Connor, who has sought to overturn the McGirt ruling, declined comment.
“The Judicial Conference’s recommendation is a good one," Chickasaw Nation senior counsel Stephen Greetham said in a statement. "As Oklahoma’s criminal docket shifts to federal and tribal court, we appreciate our federal partners’ doing the analysis and advocating for the resources needed to implement the law."
Greetham said 1,234 cases have been filed in tribal court since the McGirt ruling, up from an average of 74 cases per year previously.