Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Terence Lancaster

Thursday 18 October 2007 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

May I first applaud Michael Leapman's obituary of Terence Lancaster [10 October], my old colleague on the Daily Mirror of pre-Maxwell days (and briefly during Maxwell's tenure), writes Geoffrey Goodman.

However, I am compelled to correct his reference to Lancaster and myself having "reluctantly agreed" to Maxwell's demands about how the Mirror should handle the front-page article to which Michael Leapman refers. Neither of us agreed to that. We both insisted on changes approved by the then editor Mike Molloy, who was also intimately involved in the incident.

These amendments to Maxwell's original demands not only modified but changed the thrust of criticism about Arthur Scargill. Indeed, the final piece also included considerable criticism of Margaret Thatcher's policy on the coal industry – in defiance of Maxwell's own views.

Even so, both Lancaster and myself told Molloy we would not have our by-lines on the article because of Maxwell's interference. The editor knew we were both prepared to resign over the issue. It was one of the first tests of Mike Molloy's courageous editorship during that difficult and tense period.

It is also well-known Fleet Street history that my own later departure from the Mirror was precipitated by Maxwell's attempt to interefere with one of my weekly columns dealing with the Government's handling of the miners' strike.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in