Professor Sir Richard Southwood
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.When Sir Richard Southwood's working party issued its report on BSE in 1989, as the then chief cook and bottle washer at the Institute of Biology (of which he was an enthusiastic Fellow) I sought a copy of it, writes Philip N. O'Donoughue [further to the obituary by Lord May of Oxford, 9 November].
I was in for two surprises. One was the unwillingness of the Department of Health and Maff to distribute it, something that disturbed Southwood. The other was to discover how thoughtful and balanced was the committee's approach to this difficult problem. There were many able contributors to the working party's report, but it had the stamp of authority that characterised all Southwood's work.
In his obituary Lord May notes the report's mention of possible spread of BSE to man. It was thought to be unlikely but, if it did occur, so serious that it merited early and thorough investigation. That proposal appeared not to be welcomed by the government of the day, leaving us all too vulnerable when inter-specific transmission did occur. Southwood was disappointed that the advice had been ignored, but apparently resigned to being blamed for that by those who had heard of but not read the report.
In fact it afforded a perceptive early caution to balance voices uncritically urging the safety of beef consumption. Southwood's working party may have vexed the meat trade in this, but by proposing sensible safety measures it did more than most in saving our meat industry.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments