Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Oscar Niemeyer

William Robert Haines
Tuesday 11 December 2012 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Further to the obituary of Oscar Niemeyer by Jay Merrick (7 December), I saw a number of his earlier buildings in 1953, when I was in Brazil with an oil company. I was overwhelmed by his "shock of the new", in Merrick's words. His break from convention was breathtaking. The Department of Education building in Rio was built in the 1930s, before air conditoning. With Rio's high temperatures and high humidity, the conventional approach was a veranda on the ground floor, with mini roofs over the windows on the floors above. This cools the air, but darkens the inside, so that electric light sometimes had to be employed during the hours of daylight.

A similar approach was used by the British and other Europeans in the Far East and Brazil, until Niemeyer's arrival. Instead of verandas or mini roofs he used horizontal louvres to keep the sunlight off the window, which could be altered by hand to admit or restrict light. Ventilation was achieved by windows which opened by hand, achieving an air circulation equalled only by Arab wind towers of the Middle East.

Another break from convention was to use any site as it was, instead of flattening and squaring it as practised by British architects. A house by a hairpin bend on the coast south of Rio was constructed on several levels, corresponding to the patches of ground down the cliff face. Rooms were connected by bridges across the gulleys. Moreover, Niemeyer did not forget people, even on difficult sites. The School of Dentistry near Rio was on a crescent-shaped site, with a drop of some 10 feet along the outer edge. His solution was a crescent-shaped building, leaving the lower level as a piazza for people.

On returning to the UK in 1960, exasperated by the conventional houses being built, I contacted a British architect who had worked in Brazil. His response was that British builders could not replicate the flowing concrete designs commonplace in Brazil, so I had to settle for a standard box. Nowadays, exasperation has been overtaken by despair when I see the mock-Tudor kitsch being built brick by brick, tile by tile, using technology 2,000 years old. If Niemeyer saw them, he would exclaim in the words of his favourite city, Porto Alegre, "Que barbaridade" – "What barbarism".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in