Nobel Prize team seeks to flout founder's will
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.WHEN WILHELM Rontgen won the first Nobel Prize in 1901 for his discovery of X-rays, he was given, besides the gold medal, 150,000 Swedish kronor - a sum worth roughly 20 times a university professor's salary, writes Julian Champkin.
Today he would get only a fraction of that. The Nobel Foundation, which bestows the world-famous prizes for scientists, writers and peacemakers, has fallen on hard times.
So concerned are the trustees that they are petitioning the Swedish government for permission to gamble on the stock exchange with what is left of Alfred Nobel's 1896 legacy.
He bestowed $3.6m for his prizes in Physics, Chemistry, Medicine, Literature and Peace and, paradoxically, the fund is now worth more than a third of a billion dollars. But only the interest can be used; and under the terms of his will the administrators can invest his fortune only in very safe but very low-yielding bonds.
Now Sweden faces a predicament: should the government ignore Nobel's wishes, and, if it does, what would happen if the trustees invested badly?
By 1920, inflation had reduced the value of the prizes to a quarter of their original worth. Exempted from tax in 1946, it still took until 1991 to restore their worth, says Michael Sohlman, director of the Nobel Foundation. He does not think even that is enough. "The aim is to increase the prize money in future years," he says.
Yet his efforts may be pointless. Few, if any, Nobel laureates are in it for the money.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments