Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

No outside checks on scandal surgeon

Glenda Cooper Social Affairs Correspondent
Thursday 19 November 1998 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE GYNAECOLOGIST at the centre of one of Britain's worst medical scandals was in charge of monitoring his own performance, ensuring his failures remained uncovered for years.

Rodney Ledward, the self-styled fastest gynaecologist in the South-east, was put in charge of clinical audits for the obstetrics and gynaecology department at the William Harvey hospital, in Ashford, Kent, in 1989. In this role, he was responsible for monitoring his own and the rest of the department's performance.

More than 170 women have now come forward, claiming to have been injured by Mr Ledward, some saying they suffered pain and disability for years.

The surgeon was found guilty of serious professional misconduct by the General Medical Council after examination of his surgical record between 1989 and 1996. The GMC verdict was based on 10 cases in which operations were botched or should not have gone ahead, but scores more women have since come forward and more than 40 are considering legal action

The hospital confirmed last night that Mr Ledward had been put in charge of clinical audits but said this was standard NHS practice at the time and there was no reason to assume there was any problem.

Cases such as Mr Ledward's have caused concern at the Department of Health, which has been pressing for more external checks and balances. "Bad doctors should no more expect to be employed by the health service than bad teachers should expect to be employed by the education service," the Health minister Alan Milburn said last night.

In July, Frank Dobson, the Secretary of State for Health, announced the creation of the Commission for Health Improvement whose director would be the NHS equivalent of the head of the Ofsted schools inspectors. He oversees a rolling programme of reviewing NHS trusts' performance and ensuring high clinical standards.

Mr Ledward was also in charge of postgraduate education in the department, overseeing doctors' training. He also worked as a district tutor for the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. As such he was in charge of various management functions.

The South Kent Hospitals NHS Trust has been asked to provide a report into the Ledward case within a fortnight, after which ministers will decide what action to take. There are also bound to be questions over why no anaesthetist made a complaint about Mr Ledward.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in