No compensation deal for hepatitis victims
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.No special payments will be made to people who contracted the liver disease hepatitis C from blood products and transfusions, Baroness Cumberlege told the House of Lords yesterday. Lady Cumberlege, Under- Secretary of State for Health, said the Government could not open the floodgates to compensation claims.
The Haemophilia Society, which is seeking payments for members with hepatitis C who become ill, immediately said it would continue its fight.
"We are not surprised at the stand adopted by the Government. They responded in just the same way at the start of the HIV campaign," a spokesman said.
He was referring to the Government's decision in 1990, after a two-year battle, to pay hardship money to haemophiliacs and then to transfusion patients who caught HIV from contaminated blood supplies.
After protracted legal arguments, the Government made £42m available in a trust fund.
The spokesman added: "The society believes there is a strong moral case and will continue its discussions with the Government." He said it was seeking the same financial treatment for sufferers and their families as achieved by the HIV group.
Lady Cumberlege said: "We have great sympathy for those affected, but have no plans to make special payments.
"We have to be careful not to open the floodgates to every case that is made for compensation. If we were to do that, we would get into the US situation where doctors are very frightened now to give a medical treatment for fear of being sued. That would actually finish the NHS and we would all be the poorer."
The minister told the Lords that HIV differed from hepatitis in that it was a very new disease, believed invariably to be fatal, and with devastating health, social and financial effects. But many hepatitis sufferers "could lead ordinary lives for decades".
Lady Cumberlege was responding to Lord Ashley of Stoke, who declared: "Virtually all haemophiliacs who received blood transfusions before 1986 have been infected ... Although no fault is involved, they need payment just the same as those who were infected by the HIV virus through contaminated blood. There is no difference in the principle and there should be none in the practice."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments