Nirex retreats from lab appeal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Nirex, the nuclear waste agency, announced yesterday that it would not mount a legal challenge to the Government's decision this month to refuse planning permission for an underground laboratory in Cumbria. The laboratory 3,000ft below ground was intended to pave the way for a huge, subterranean nuclear waste dump at the same site near the Sellafield nuclear reprocessing plant of British Nuclear Fuels (BNFL).
Environmentalists opposed to the project said there had to be a radical rethink of the Government's attitude to dealing with the growing stockpile of radioactive waste.
Nirex, owned by Britain's nuclear industry and created to develop an underground waste dump, also announced that there would be job cuts among its research and development staff in Cumbria and contractors following the refusal by John Gummer, the Secretary of State for the Environment.
Sir Richard Morris, Nirex's chairman, said: "The ground rules seem to have changed during the inquiry process. We cannot get the information to show whether the site is safe or not without a rock laboratory but it now appears we cannot win approval for a rock laboratory without first showing the site is safe."
Nirex says Mr Gummer's decision raises questions about how the programme for deep disposal of intermediate level nuclear waste - which is still government policy - can be carried forward.
Dr Rachel Weston of Friends of the Earth said: "We need to go back to the drawing board now. The industry needs to stop pretending the disposal of nuclear waste is easy ... there now has to be a complete rethink on the way we manage radioactive waste in this country."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments