Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Newspaper `wrong' over Carey article

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

ANDREW BROWN

Religious Affairs Correspondent

The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr George Carey, has won a Press Complaints Commission adjudication against the Sunday Times, for a front-page story which claimed he was ready to bless a marriage between Prince Charles and Mrs Camilla Parker Bowles. It is the first time the Archbishop of Canterbury has ever formally complained about his treatment by the press.

The story, which appeared on 31 December 1995, arose from a telephone briefing given to Lesley Thomas, then the Sunday Times' religious affairs correspondent, by Dr Andrew Purkis, Dr Carey's Secretary for Public Affairs.

Dr Purkis was asked what the Archbishop's position would be regarding a possible marriage between the prince and his mistress. He replied that he could not comment on individual cases, but that that he was prepared to set out the general principles on which the Archbishop would approach questions involving the remarriage of divorced people.

Dr Carey's general position, in common with that of most of the Church of England, is that he will give some second marriages a service of blessing, but will not conduct a marriage service for a couple with former spouses still alive. As the conversation proceeded, Dr Purkis expanded on this, under the impression that he was talking generally; and the Sunday Times noted his remarks in the hope that they had a particular application.

The story which was printed claimed the authority of "Lambeth Palace sources" for the assertion that Dr Carey was "prepared to bless a union of the Prince of Wales and Camilla Parker Bowles." It was immediately denied by Lambeth Palace, which demanded that the Sunday Times print a retraction and, when the newspaper refused, took the matter to the Press Complaints Commission.

In its report, the PCC said that a transcript of the conversation "made it clear that the reporter's questions had been put specifically with regard to the Prince of Wales. [Dr Purkis] had been anxious not to comment on any one case in particular, but

"Nevertheless, there was no basis for the newspaper to report that the Archbishop was `ready' to bless a hypothetical remarriage of the Prince."

In the 17th century, the puritan journalist William Prynne had both his ears cut off for writing pamphlets against Dr Carey's predecessor, Archbishop Laud. The Sunday Times will only be expected to print the the PCC's adjudication.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in