`New Statesman' wage bill queried
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Geoffrey Robinson, the Paymaster General, was yesterday called on to make a Commons statement on his links with the New Statesman magazine.
John Redwood, the Conservative spokesman on trade and industry, said he had gone through the company's accounts and was baffled by the fact that the magazine's salaries were paid by a Robinson trust to the New Statesman, which passed the money to a former Robinson company, Stenbell, which in turn paid the salaries.
"The obvious thing to do," Mr Redwood said, "would be for Geoffrey Robinson to give the New Statesman the money, and for them to pay the wages."
Mr Redwood said he wanted to know whether Mr Robinson was maintaining influence, through his trust payments, over the editor of the New Statesman. "It would be a matter of considerable public interest," he said, "and in the light of what the accounts tell us, we should be told more in Parliament about the relationship."
Ian Hargreaves, the magazine's editor, told The Independent last night: "I certainly do not feel myself subject to undue influence of any kind, and I do not note from what Mr Redwood says that he has any evidence of such influence."
He added that the relationship between Stenbell and the magazine had been set up when Mr Robinson took it over, after it had gone to the wall, and the arrangements had persisted. "I know it would be nice for people to be able to conclude that it was all deeply evil," he said, "but Mr Redwood is grasping at sinister straws to create a scandal."
- Anthony Bevins
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments