New funds bring on a British Ivy League
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Elite universities in Britain are moving closer to an American-style Ivy League, after government advisers decided to give them their biggest ever share of research funds.
In the United States, the Ivy League colleges receive proportionally far more research money than less prestigious institutions.
Leaders of the quango which distributes university funds in the UK have agreed that departments awarded top ratings of five or five stars in last month's research assessmentwill receive three or four times as much money as those rated average.
Grade one/two departments, concentrated in the former polytechnics, will receive none of the pounds 680m research funding. Four years ago only departments rated one received nothing.
Alice Frost, policy analyst at the Higher Education Funding Council, which distributes the money said: "It is more selective because more money is going to top-rated departments ... we think it recognises world-class excellence."
Only 20 universities have 10 or more five or five star departments - those with research of world-class standard. The list includes Oxford, Cambridge University College London, Bristol, Sheffield, Birmingham, Manchester and Imperial College.
More departments have been rated five and five star this time than in 1992. To ensure that dons in these departments receive the same level of funding as before, the amount of money for less successful departments has been squeezed.
Some former polytechnics, such as Staffordshire, de Montfort and Liverpool John Moores, have a comparatively high number of departments rated too. These departments will be eligible for money from a special fund but the amounts involved are expected to be small.
Ms Frost said the former polytechnics would get more money overall because their ratings had improved but the gap between the top and the bottom would be wider. The same was true of the older institutions.
The exercise has brought to the fore the old rivalry between Oxford and Cambridge. Oxford may benefit most because it has a higher proportion of five star departments than Cambridge. Oxford chose to enter a small proportion of its academics than some other top universities such as Cambridge, the London School of Economics and Warwick in the hope that it would achieve higher ratings.
A spokesman for the Committee of Vice-Chancellors said: "It is a pity that there is not enough money to bring on more people in research but, if we have to be selective, it is better to concentrate the money than spreading it more evenly."
A spokesman for de Montfort University said that it was pleased with its progress in the research ratings. "We want to compete on equal terms with everyone else, though it would be nice if we had research funding for 35 or 40 years like some of the universities we are competing with."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments