Muslim school methods criticised by inspectors
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.FRAN ABRAMS
Education Correspondent
Plans for Britain's first state-funded Muslim school suffered a serious setback last night after a critical report from government inspectors.
The inspectors said that Islamia school in Brent, north London, was failing to teach the national curriculum and was breaching health and safety rules in a number of ways. They also questioned the school's discipline policy, under which pupils are hit on the hand with rulers if they misbehave.
Islamia school is currently run privately, relying on fees and private donations to survive. After being turned down for the voluntary-aided status which many Church of England and Catholic schools enjoy, it is now applying to "opt in" and become grant maintained.
But inspectors from Ofsted, the school inspection body, found that its teaching methods had serious weaknesses and it was failing to diagnose pupils' special needs properly.
Two reports published yesterday on the school's two sections, a primary department and a girls' high school, were very critical of its methods.
Although they declared that the high school met the minimum requirements of the 1944 education act they criticised its discipline policy. It was one of the very few schools which still had corporal punishment, the inspectors said, and it should think again about it. If Islamia was allowed to become a state school it would no longer be allowed to use physical punishment.
However, the girls' school had satisfactory standards of achievement and pupils were well motivated and well behaved, they said.
The primary school was criticised for its teaching methods, which the inspectors said failed to stretch the brightest but were too hard for the slowest. The school had been unable to implement the national curriculum and staff were not checked against a government list of banned teachers - those who have been struck off for abuse or misconduct - before being employed.
Parents and the community gave the school a great deal of support, however, and the welfare of the pupils was well looked after.
Last night, the general secretary of the association of Muslim schools, Ibrahim Hewitt, said that the reports gave extra weight to Islamia's case for state funding rather than weakening it. The girls' high school had some of the best GCSE results in Brent, he added.
"Obviously, if you are trying to run a school on a tight budget there may well be things which slip through, which otherwise would not or should not happen. This strengthens the case for state funding," he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments