MPs to investigate Aitken arms company
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.MPs are set to examine whether BMARC, a company which counted Jonathan Aitken among its directors, sent arms to Singapore that subsequently went to Iran in defiance of published government guidelines and a United Nations arms embargo, writes Chris Blackhurst.
The cross-party Commons Trade and Industry Committee received assurances from Michael Heseltine, President of the Board of Trade, at a private meeting yesterday that his department would co-operate with their inquiry. Mr Heseltine's agreement and the committee's inquiry will cast a cloud over Mr Aitken.
The move is expected to postpone another inquiry, due to start in the autumn, into the Government's controversial nuclear industry sell-off.
A senior committee source said it was "reasonably satisfied" with Mr Heseltine's promises. This was in contrast to doubts expressed by committee members when Mr Heseltine made his dramatic statement a fortnight ago inviting them to look into BMARC.The committee was told it would receive co-operation in four areas: supply of information from ministers; from named civil servants; Customs and Excise; and the intelligence services. This last may prove to be the most significant of all. In the supergun affair, crucial reports from MI6 were not made available to MPs.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments