Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

MPs may face jail for corruption

Stephen Castle Political Editor
Saturday 07 June 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Government will this week announce plans to make sleaze in the House of Commons an offence punishable by up to seven years in jail.

The move, which is a response to the cash-for-questions scandal, will end the anomaly whereby parliamentarians are not covered by the country's anti-corruption laws.

Under proposals to be outlined by Jack Straw, the Home Secretary, on Tuesday, bribing an MP will become a criminal offence alongside other forms of corruption. The proposed legislation will also cover other officials in public life such as judges, councillors and other public servants. At present MPs are exempt from laws on corruption that apply to the rest of the population.

Government sources say the initiative is a central part of the Prime Minister's commitment to clean up public life. During the election Tony Blair made Conservative sleaze a key campaigning issue, arguing that the Tory years had taken their toll on the public's perception of MPs.

The proposals are likely to prove controversial among MPs who have traditionally guarded jealously their right to police their own disciplinary matters.

Sleaze dominated the final years of John Major's premiership with allegations that MPs, including Neil Hamilton and Tim Smith, both former ministers, accepted gifts and cash from the Harrods boss Mohamed al-Fayed. Mr Hamilton lost his seat in Tatton at the election to Martin Bell, former BBC war correspondent, who stood on an anti-corruption ticket.

However, since the election Labour has also been embroiled in a controversy with Mohamed Sarwar, the MP for Glasgow Govan, accused of breaking election laws by giving a pounds 5,000 loan to a political opponent. His case is being investigated by the police and by the party's National Executive Committee.

Ministers admit that a Bill to change the law will not be ready until the 1998 parliamentary session. The detail of the plans, and the issue of whether an element of parliamentary privilege will remain, has yet to be worked out.

Mr Straw's eventual decision on the fine print of the proposals will take into account recommendations from a report by Sir Gordon Downey, Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, into the cash-for-questions affairs. Ministers are also awaiting the outcome of Lord Nolan's report into local government which could propose a new statutory offence of misconduct in public office. Mr Straw has already signed the EU convention on corruption.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in