MPs criticise new rules on school meals
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SCHOOL MEALS guidelines to prevent chips being served more than three days a week were criticised by an influential committee of MPs yesterday. It said national standards, due to come into force in 2002, will not cut the amount of sugar and fat that children eat.
Under the guidelines, which specify which food groupsshould make up school lunches and which should be avoided, baked beans can be on the menu only once a week. Meat pies must be served with half a portion of vegetables, pasta must be weekly and fish must be an option on at least one day.
The all-party Education Select Committee called for guidelines based on the nutritional content of food. Its report said: "While we welcome the food group approach as helpful, non-technical guidance for lay governors and parents, we are not persuaded that it is a suitable basis for statutory regulation."
The MPs called for spot checks on dinners and said schools should make more effort to check the quality of packed lunches. They also recommended the Government do research into the low take-up of free school meals by children entitled to them.
They criticised schools that offered only cold lunches or sandwiches as missing "an opportunity to raise and broaden nutritional standards".
Leading article,
Review, page 3
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments