Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Move for a better cut of surgeon

Jeremy Laurance
Wednesday 09 July 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Hospitals providing emergency surgery should be halved to concentrate skills and raise standards, the Royal College of Surgeons said yesterday.

Accidents involving inexperienced surgeons operating without adequate supervision, which have resulted in deaths and injuries to patients, had been identified in a series of reports, the college said. The increasing complexity of surgery meant that concentrating skills in larger centres was the only way to improve the service and protect patients.

In a report published yesterday the college says the ideal emergency surgical service should serve a population of 500,000, about twice the current average. Sir Rodney Sweetnam, president of the college, said: "A comprehensive service can no longer be provided in every district general hospital. We are not suggesting the closure of hospitals. We are suggesting that the time has come for them to co-operate with each other." Hospitals within half an hour's travelling time of each other should consider concentrating emergency surgical services on one site while the other provided non-urgent surgery, out-patient or other treatment. Politicians, the public and the profession would have to accept that not every service could be provided close to home.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in